Skip to content
Supreme Court Cases

Fry v. Napolean Community Schools

Issue: Does the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act’s requirement that plaintiffs exhaust administrative remedies before suing under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act apply to plaintiffs seeking damages, which are not available under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act?

The Court clarifies the definition of “disabled” under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and allows students to bring lawsuits directly under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504) without requesting an administrative hearing under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) when their claim is not related to the adequacy of their education

Year: 2017

Case Category:

  • Service Animals, Title II and IDEA

BRAGDON v. ABBOTT (97-156) 107 F.3d 934

Questions before the Court:
  1. Whether asymptomatic HIV is a disability under the ADA.
  2. When deciding whether a private health care provider must perform invasive procedures on an infectious patient in his office, should courts defer to the provider’s professional judgment, as long as it is reasonable in light of then current medical knowledge?

Year: 1998

Case Category:

  • Definition of Disability

SPECTOR v. NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE LTD.

Question before the Court:
  1. Whether Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act applies to foreign flag cruise ships while sailing in U.S. waters or while at U.S. ports.

http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/supct/search/display.html?terms=americans with disabilities act&url=/supct/html/03-1388.ZO.html

Year: 2005

Case Category:

  • Title III and Foreign Ships

TENNESSEE v. LANE

  1. Whether Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 is a proper exercise of Congress’ power under Section 5 of the 14th Amendment and thus validly abrogates state sovereign immunity.

http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/supct/search/display.html?terms=americans with disabilities act&url=/supct/html/02-1667.ZO.html

Year: 2004

Case Category:

  • Title II and Courthouse Access

RAYTHEON CO. v. HERNANDEZ

  1. Whether the Americans with Disabilities Act confers preferential rehire rights on employees lawfully terminated for misconduct, such as illegal drug use.

http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/supct/search/display.html?terms=americans with disabilities act&url=/supct/html/02-749.ZO.html

Year: 2003

Case Category:

  • Employer Rehire Policy

CLACKAMAS GASTROENTEROLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C. v. WELLS (01-1435) 271 F.3d 903

Question before the Court:
  1. Whether the four physician-shareholders who own the professional corporation and constitute its board of directors are counted as employees for purposes of determining whether or not the corporation was covered under the Employment Provisions of the ADA by having 15 or more employees.

Year: 2003

Case Category:

  • Definition of Employee

US AIRWAYS, INC. v. BARNETT (00-1250) 228 F.3d 1105

Questions before the Court:
  1. How the ADA resolves a potential conflict between the interests of a disabled worker who seeks assignment to a particular position as a “reasonable accommodation” and the interests of other workers with superior rights to bid for the job under an employer’s seniority system.
  2. Does the accommodation demand trump the seniority system?

Year: 2002

Case Category:

  • Reasonable Accommodation

BARNES v. GORMAN (01-682) 257 F.3d 738

Question before the Court:
  1. Whether punitive damages may be awarded in a private cause of action brought under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

Year: 2002

Case Category:

  • Punitive and Compensatory Damages

CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. v. ECHAZABAL (00-1406) 226 F.3d 1063

Question before the Court:
  1. Whether the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 permits a regulation of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission which authorizes refusal to hire an individual because his performance on the job would endanger his own health, owing to a disability (direct threat to self).

Year: 2002

Case Category:

  • Direct Threat

TOYOTA MOTOR MFG., KY, INC. v. WILLIAMS (00-1089) 224 F.3d 840

Question before the Court:
  1. What is the proper standard for determining whether an individual is substantially limited in performing manual tasks.

Year: 2002

Case Category:

  • Definition of Disability
Back to top arrow

Grant Disclaimer    Accessibility Statement     Contact Us